Another frequent objection to an old earth lies with the apparently global scope of the Flood. And as the narrative goes, the time came for the formless earth to be inhabited. This period could have spanned as much as several billions years, or it could have been much less; the text simply does not tell us how long.
The historical narrative according Jesus is that in the beginning God created us, God made us man and woman, and God made man and woman for marriage.
As I said previously, Adam did not die physically on the day that he ate of the tree, but lived a full life afterwards. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day. In addition to these, there have been "human" footprints, carvings, tools and pottery found in rock layers supposedly to M years before man was evolved.
Notice Jesus mentions nothing about length of time, duration of creation event, or any other tangible sign of the passage of time. One does not need to look too far for examples. Some strengths of the young earth position are: In the debate, Ken Ham articulated his belief in the young earth view, and attacked Christians who hold to the old earth as inconsistent.
Adam named the animals before the Fall. Old earth Christians defended their view, arguing that the Bible does not require believers to believe creation took exactly six twenty-four hour days.
Consider the first three verses of Genesis 1: One of the most frequent theological arguments for a young-earth pertains to the common presumption that death did not exist prior to the Fall.
To be sure, the issues dividing young and old earth creationists are both complex and significant. This is a problem because, as I have said before, nothing comes from nothing.
The interpretive judgments appear to be determined by the desire to make interpretation correspond to science, rather than by the text itself, or else appear arbitrary. I believe it is historical narrative that is literal. At face value, it does not appear that Adam could have completed such a monumental task in a mere hour period.
Old earth creationists view the scientific dating methods as being reasonably accurate and therefore accept that the earth and the universe are truly old.
But what about man. They contend that the dating methods are flawed, at best, and are implemented by scientists with bias, presuppositions, and agendas. Rather, it says that God commanded the earth to sprout vegetation and trees. The very old view of the earth is held mainly by evolutionists because they believe that matter is eternal, that matter was affected in some way "big bang", etc.
Moses Joshua It has been suggested that the Mosaic genealogies are perhaps only 20 to 40 percent complete. All creatures existed simultaneously in common environment. Anthropos specifically refers to human beings, not animals. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
The young Earth creationist belief that the age of the Earth is 6, to 10, years old conflicts with the age of billion years measured using independently cross-validated geochronological methods including radiometric dating.
Oct 01, · Young Earth Vs. Old Earth Debate at the Creation and Earth History Museum. Please note, as a ministry, allianceimmobilier39.com officially holds to young earth creationism.
We truly and fully believe that young earth creationism best fits with the biblical account of creation. However, we recognize that old earth creationism is a valid viewpoint that a Christian can hold. In no. Old earth and young earth advocates ought to unite under the banner which is the glorious Gospel of Christ.
Salvation is not contingent on what one believes about the age of the earth. This article has not, of course, dealt with the larger issues of science, nor has it offered a.
Old-earth creationists accept the geological and cosmological estimates of a billion year old earth. Scripture speaks not of a young earth or an old earth, but an ancient earth: Hear O mountains you everlasting foundations of the earth (Micah ). The ancient mountains crumbled, and the age-old hills collapsed (Habakkuk ).
Old earth and young earth advocates ought to unite under the banner which is the glorious Gospel of Christ. Salvation is not contingent on what one believes about the age of the earth.
This article has not, of course, dealt with the larger issues of science, nor has it offered a .Young earth vs old earth